From: Nik M. <add...@gm...> - 2006-03-03 15:43:20
|
On 3/3/06, John W. Lerch <jl...@pr...> wrote: > Also - I assume x_TXD =3D FF_TXD, and same with RXD, CTS, and RTS? My original table listed everything correctly. You can use it to get a better description of all the pins: http://www.gumstix.org/tikiwiki/tiki-pagehistory.php?page=3DI%2FO&preview= =3D78 > > -----Original Message----- > From: John W. Lerch > Sent: Friday, March 03, 2006 10:37 AM > To: 'gum...@li...' > Subject: Re: [Gumstix-users] Updated I/O page on wiki > > Gordon/Craig/Nik/& List - > > The one nice thing that's missing is the GPIO listings for the signals. > If there's any way to reincorporate that it would be helpful. > > Two Questions: > > 1) I am looking at the k version (latest 400xm build). We want to use > HWUART and the Etherstix, which means we can't use HWRXD on GP49 because > the Etherstix uses it as nPWE. So, I want to configure GP42-45 as > HWUART (we are not using BlueTooth). I assume the ports we want to > connect to are BT_RXD, BT_TXD, BT_CTS, and BT_RTS and NOT the HW ports? > > 2) We received word that our Gumstix 400xm is the k version, but the > silkscreen between the Flash chips indicates that we have "gumstix #10." > Does this mean revision j (10th letter in alphabet) or is there > somewhere I should look to crossreference that would indicate it's the k > version? > > Thanks, > John > > > > ------------------------------------------------------- > This SF.Net email is sponsored by xPML, a groundbreaking scripting langua= ge > that extends applications into web and mobile media. Attend the live webc= ast > and join the prime developer group breaking into this new coding territor= y! > http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmdlnk&kid=110944&bid$1720&dat=121642 > _______________________________________________ > gumstix-users mailing list > gum...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/gumstix-users > |