Re: [Gumstix-users] jamvm version

[Jay P. <ja...@bl...>]

Craig,
	Will do.  I'm also going to work out a build targets for rxtx and avetanaBT 
(hopefully).  I'll know by tonight on the jamvm version.

Thanks,
-Jay

On Thursday 16 February 2006 12:17, Craig Hughes wrote:
> On Feb 16, 2006, at 5:50 AM, Jay Petersen wrote:
> > All,
> > 	I was wondering why the jamvm version is 1.3.1 and not the latest
> > version
> > 1.4.2?  Is there an issue with the newer version?
>
> Nope -- the only reason is that nobody's updated it yet in
> buildroot.  afaik it should work with the newer version.  Try editing
> the jamvm.mk file and change the version number -- if it compiles OK
> let me know and I'll fix the buildroot :)
>
> C
>
>
>
> -------------------------------------------------------
> This SF.net email is sponsored by: Splunk Inc. Do you grep through log
> files for problems?  Stop!  Download the new AJAX search engine that makes
> searching your log files as easy as surfing the  web.  DOWNLOAD SPLUNK!
> http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=lnk&kid=103432&bid=230486&dat=121642
> _______________________________________________
> gumstix-users mailing list
> gum...@li...
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/gumstix-users