From: Patrick P. <pat...@gm...> - 2005-06-27 15:54:07
|
> Oh, and one more thing: Why do you care so much about debugging informati= on > for libraries? When I debug some software on a PC, I almost never have an= y > debugging info for the libraries (I definitely don't have it for the M$ > ones, and I've never installed a Fedora "debuginfo" RPM either), and that > doesn't keep me from debugging my software. You'll never get debugging in= fo > for AMS either. So why is it so important to get it for libraries? Because sometimes I write libraries instead of softwares. =20 > And anyway, the kernel libraries are generally written in A68k, which > doesn't support debugging information anyway. At best you'll have the nam= es > of some labels in the library and that's all you can get. I can't see how > not having that would be a show stopper. =20 This information (label information) will be apreciate for a programmer. bsr my_function_1 is much more explicit than bsr 0x124532 By the way, could I find a way to create debug information for OS? (aka for PedroM). -- PpHd |