From: Daniele F. <df...@gm...> - 2007-06-29 10:29:14
|
Please revise the attached patch fixing the following leaks: ==7869== 92 bytes in 4 blocks are definitely lost in loss record 72 of 162 ==7869== at 0x401B704: malloc (vg_replace_malloc.c:149) ==7869== by 0x492651B: vasprintf (in /lib/tls/libc-2.3.6.so) ==7869== by 0x47C7DD6: g_vasprintf (in /usr/lib/libglib-2.0.so.0.1200.11) ==7869== by 0x47B9DF5: g_strdup_vprintf (in /usr/lib/libglib-2.0.so.0.1200.11) ==7869== by 0x47B9E1A: g_strdup_printf (in /usr/lib/libglib-2.0.so.0.1200.11) ==7869== by 0x806666D: details_setup_widget (details.c:689) ==7869== by 0x8067A2A: details_edit (details.c:1568) ==7869== by 0x475042A: g_cclosure_marshal_VOID__VOID (in /usr/lib/libgobject-2.0.so.0.1200.11) ==7869== by 0x4742F8A: g_closure_invoke (in /usr/lib/libgobject-2.0.so.0.1200.11) ==7869== by 0x4753BEC: (within /usr/lib/libgobject-2.0.so.0.1200.11) ==7869== by 0x47550E8: g_signal_emit_valist (in /usr/lib/libgobject-2.0.so.0.1200.11) ==7869== by 0x4755298: g_signal_emit (in /usr/lib/libgobject-2.0.so.0.1200.11) ==7869== 867 bytes in 27 blocks are definitely lost in loss record 118 of 162 ==7869== at 0x401B704: malloc (vg_replace_malloc.c:149) ==7869== by 0x47A6095: g_malloc (in /usr/lib/libglib-2.0.so.0.1200.11) ==7869== by 0x47BA14F: g_strconcat (in /usr/lib/libglib-2.0.so.0.1200.11) ==7869== by 0x806A4E8: coverart_set_images (display_coverart.c:1805) ==7869== by 0x806E98E: pm_selection_changed_cb (display_playlists.c:1444) ==7869== by 0x475042A: g_cclosure_marshal_VOID__VOID (in /usr/lib/libgobject-2.0.so.0.1200.11) ==7869== by 0x4742F8A: g_closure_invoke (in /usr/lib/libgobject-2.0.so.0.1200.11) ==7869== by 0x4753BEC: (within /usr/lib/libgobject-2.0.so.0.1200.11) ==7869== by 0x47550E8: g_signal_emit_valist (in /usr/lib/libgobject-2.0.so.0.1200.11) ==7869== by 0x4755298: g_signal_emit (in /usr/lib/libgobject-2.0.so.0.1200.11) ==7869== by 0x443774F: (within /usr/lib/libgtk-x11-2.0.so.0.1000.11) ==7869== by 0x44484AF: (within /usr/lib/libgtk-x11-2.0.so.0.1000.11) -- Daniele |