From: Christophe F. <te...@gn...> - 2005-09-28 09:57:01
|
Le mercredi 28 septembre 2005 =C3=A0 11:52 +0200, Jorg Schuler a =C3=A9cr= it : > Most people will want to use the whole functionality, I guess... But fo= r > those (few) who don't, maybe we can make libgdk dependency optional. > However, I'd vote for keeping the interface identical and use an assert= ion > g_return_if_fail (HAVE_LIBGDK) instead. Is this any kind of standard? That makes sense, I'll see what I can do when I can free some hacking time (this week end I hope) Christophe |