From: GStreamer (bugzilla.gnome.o. <bug...@gn...> - 2010-05-26 15:44:13
|
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=618644 GStreamer | gstreamer (core) | git --- Comment #12 from Stefan Kost (gstreamer, gtkdoc dev) <en...@so...> 2010-05-26 15:44:03 UTC --- (In reply to comment #11) > (In reply to comment #8) > > I think we need better documentation of the states a pad can be in, we already > > have: active, blocked, blocking and linked. > > Seems to be a bit outside of the scope of this bug though, no ? > Yes, one could call it a pre-requisite. I am just a bit worried about the independent state flags for pads. It is certainly not blocking these patches. > > > > "awake" could be named "negotiatable", if the effect of turning awake of is the > > same to get_caps, like setting blocked to push/pull. > > Indeed negotiable is better. Updated the patches accordingly. > > Any more comments ? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.gnome.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. You are the assignee for the bug. |