From: Andre K. <ak...@gm...> - 2009-11-20 12:31:35
|
Am Donnerstag, den 19.11.2009, 13:26 -0800 schrieb Michael Smith: > On Thu, Nov 19, 2009 at 1:19 PM, Stefan Kost <en...@ho...> wrote: > > Vincent, we're not ignoring you :) We kind of have business as usual in Gst > > land. After guadec it became somewhat quiet around the 1.0 discussion. Now we > > discuss some more and March seems tough from my point of view. I hope other core > > devs reply as well. > > More than just the timing, I think it's that there's a lack of > consensus in the GStreamer community that there's any reason to move > to 1.0 - whilst we have a list of things we'd change, they're all > relatively minor, as far as I know, and it's a disruptive API change - > that the net benefit would be positive is far from clear. > > I think it's very clear that a GNOME 3.0 release in March would not > include a GStreamer 1.0 - but that's not a bad thing, we don't think > there's anything too major wrong with the 0.10 design. September might > be possible if there was consensus over that being a worthwhile goal > to aim for - however, GStreamer is very widely used _outside_ the > GNOME platform/desktop, so we wouldn't want to do so solely to be part > of the GNOME 3.0 plan. It was decided already that GNOME 3.0 will take place in September 2010 and that there will be a GNOME 2.30 release in March 2010: http://mail.gnome.org/archives/devel-announce-list/2009-November/msg00001.html However, your feedback is definitely appreciated and helpful to get the broader view, also with regard to marketing. andre -- mailto:ak...@gm... | failed http://www.iomc.de/ | http://blogs.gnome.org/aklapper |