From: Colin W. <wa...@re...> - 2004-11-11 19:06:17
|
On Thu, 2004-11-11 at 10:12 +0100, Thomas Vander Stichele wrote: > On Wed, 2004-11-10 at 11:31 -0500, Colin Walters wrote: > > Ok, no controversy here, so I just opened a bug: > > Heh, clever tactic Colin :) :) > FWIW - there are already base gst-register and gst-launch and friends > that are glib-only frontends for the versioned ones. This is so the > tools don't have to change across parallel installable versions and thus > the manual and FAQ don't end up being more confusing than they really > are. Right, I agree it's confusing, which is why I want to get this change upstream so that Fedora users will be able to cut n' paste commands from documentation or IRC, etc. > So, the patch should at the very least look at these tools, and use the > same mechanism to determine lib-ism and then use the correct version of > everything. Hm, I'm not sure what you mean. How would say gst-launch know whether you want to use your 32 bit plugins or your 64 bit plugins? |