From: Alex R. <sh...@al...> - 2003-02-28 02:32:40
|
Ok, so let's concentrate on information contents and then deal with formats and technical details as we go. I agree that we need a coordinator to produce rough roadmaps -- what needs to be documented -- and the more detailed outlines/structures of each potential docs. A potential problem is in possible changes in the program: it does not make much sense to document parts that are actively being developed. Fortunately, as I understand it, the program itself is not supposed to change much. Any additional functionality should be done by adding plugins, which will result in additional doc (as opposed to re-writing same text over and over). If nobody else wants to volunteer as a coordinator, I can try to work out some guidelines and offer them for discussion. Unfortunately, my writing skills are those of a foreigner, but it should do for developing the outlines. Does anyone else would like to take a lead? Alex On Thu, Feb 27, 2003 at 06:57:54PM -0700, Don Allingham wrote: > The current documentation is for the GNOME 1 version, and is very much > out of date. Ideally, it would be nice to have one person serve as a > coordinator and develop an outline and overall structure for the > documentation. Once this is done, sections of the documentation can be > handled by various different volunteers. > > Volunteers are always appreciated, especially when it comes to > documentation. My writing skills are lame at best, so it would be > wonderful if someone else could take the lead. -- Alexander Roitman http://ebner.neuroscience.umn.edu/people/alex.html Dept. of Neuroscience, Lions Research Building 2001 6th Street SE, Minneapolis, MN 55455 Tel (612) 626-7280 FAX (612) 626-9201 |