From: Marcos B. <bed...@ya...> - 2002-04-05 15:10:34
|
Hi, >Although, now that I got it, I see another issue >emerging here: >Once removed cousins are in a symmetrical >relationship, right? Take yourself and your mother's >cousin: you are 1st cousins once removed from each >other, and that can be said for both of you. >In Russian, though, the relationship is not >symmetrical: >for the same pair of people, your mom's cousing >would be a "second aunt/uncle" to you, and you would >be something like a "second niece/nephew" to her/him. We have the same problem in Portuguese. My approach to this problem was a bit different than Bernd's. I translated this string: "%(p1)s is the first cousin once removed of %(p2)s." ...into something like this: "They are distant cousins. One of the ancestors of %(p1)s, one generation above (parents), is a direct cousin of %(p2)s, or vice-versa." Or, for the sake of the example, let's take a second cousin "n" times removed. My string looks like: "They are distant cousins. One of the ancestors of %(p1)s, %(removed)d generations above, is a second degree cousin of %(p2)s, or vice-versa." (They are distant cousins. One of the ancestors of Steve, 3 generations above, is a second degree cousin of Mike, or vice-versa). I use the "vice-versa" because we don't know whether: 1) Steve's ancestor is the second degree cousin of Mike or 2) Mike's ancestor is the second degree cousin of Steve. The way I have the translations now seems to have a better result for those who are not familiar with "proper" genealogy terms (e.g. my own family). I hope this helps. Marcos ______________________________________________________________________ Music, Movies, Sports, Games! http://entertainment.yahoo.ca |