From: Don A. <dal...@us...> - 2001-10-20 13:30:21
|
On Sat, 2001-10-20 at 07:13, Bo Ros=E9n wrote: > 1. As you may know genealogical research in Sweden is dominated by > church archives and the way the Swedish Church is geographically > organized. Something a Swedish researcher cannot do without is > information about Parishes as this forms the basis for almost all > records we use. So, for Places, is there any way to include that? For > research in Sweden, we really only need a place name and parish, though > naturally we need other types of information for immigrants and > emigrants. > Would it be possible to add an option of which place categories (City, > State, Country etc for lack of a better word) to show in the place view > and to add parish? I think this could probably be done. Parish is also a common division in the Catholic Church in the US as well. > 2. Another useful thing would be a merger option for places and possibly > sources (haven't really checked if the last is needed).=20 I've been kind of holding off on mergers for a while until the database becomes stable. With the 0.6.0 release, I think the database will be pretty stable, so mergers will be at the top of the list.=20 Merging is not a easy topic - especially automatic mergers, or developing a list of potential mergers. With the support of multiple sources, it should become easier. =20 > 3. Doing a merger, it would be useful if it was somehow possible to mark > the two persons as a possible merger. I realize that you can just do a > new merger, but I think it would be a help. Agreed. >=20 > 4. for IDs, a dash between the I and the number would make it more > legible - not least for people with tired eyes. For consistency, after > P's too. >=20 > Thoughts? What about a user defined prefix? That way you could specify "I-", "P-", "Person", or whatever you wanted. Don --=20 Don Allingham dal...@us... GPG/PGP Public Key at http://members.home.net/donaldallingham/dallingham.key |