From: Jochen T. <jo...@re...> - 2001-08-12 15:55:15
|
On Sun, Aug 12, 2001 at 07:22:51AM -0600, Don Allingham wrote: > > New persons get added with id "I<number>", old persons have only "<number>". > > I have people in my database now with the same number, one with "I", one > > without. This is not good. > > This appeared in version 0.4.0. It is not a bug. I was informed that > according to the XML standard, references should not be integers, and > must be unique. So now new references for people start with I, sources > start with S, and families start with F. I do not modify id's that have > already been created. If you wish to fix this, there is now a tool to > renumber gramps' ids. Does "renumber" mean that they get totally new numbers? Or that they have a "I" prepended. I can't renumber everybody, because I use the gramps ID in other lists as references. I don't mind the "I", but having to persons with the same number or changing the number later should never happen. > > And another problem: Some male person. Some female person. I create a family > > and add some children. The XML file will have the male person as mother and > > the female person as father. Just the wrong way around. The database integrity > > check fixes this. But shouldn't happen in the first place. > > There was a bug in an earlier version that caused this. It should be > gone. > If it is not, I would appreciate it if you could tell me how to > reproduce > this. I did nothing special. Just what I wrote above. Two persons, married them. Then used "Add new child" (not " Add Existing child", mayxe thats the point). Jochen -- Jochen Topf - jo...@re... - http://www.remote.org/jochen/ |