From: Enno B. <enn...@gm...> - 2014-09-25 20:10:23
|
Nick, >> The part that seems to be missing here is the creation of a new handle >> and putting that back into the list with a replace_place_references >> call. At least that's what I see in the citations check. > Yes. The code looks more similar to that in check_repo_references though. You're right. I thought that replace_place_references was the way to go at first, but after taking a better look at the check_repo_references code, I see that using the newlist right there is more efficient, and just as easy to read. Thanks for hinting about that. regards, Enno |