From: Paul F. <pf....@gm...> - 2013-06-17 18:05:40
|
On 6/17/13, Benny Malengier <ben...@gm...> wrote: > Let me explain. I've never seen in a reference the call number in a > repository being used. I image eg my library, where a book has number 1234. > One does not add that to the citation. That seems a poor analogy/metaphor, as there will be many copies of any given book, in many libraries, so of course you would refer to a book by its title and author, or some unique referent. For an only-one-archive's only-one-document I can imagine that the archive's unique designation ("call number" or whatever) might well be the best way to describe it. |