From: Ron J. <ron...@co...> - 2013-02-13 17:24:20
|
On 02/13/2013 09:27 AM, Jesse Meyer wrote: [snip] > > Thanks for the link, I'll add my ideas once I have them fully fleshed out. > I'm thinking that the associations in the heirarchy should also be time > dependent. > For example, say "South Carolina" is a part of the United States from 1777 > to 1861, then > it would be a part of the Confederate States of America from 1861 to 1865, > then it would > return to being part of the United States from 1865 to the present day. > Then if I added Charleston as a location that's part of South Carolina, the > rest of the > information would be filled in automatically. So if John Smith was born in > Charleston in 1 > 835, and had a daughter in the same city in 1863, the country would change > automatically > when the location of "Charleston" was selected for both births. > Thoughts? > The rule base for such a scheme would be... large. And complicated. -- God didn't give America it's rights; men with guns violently took them with from other men with guns. |