[Gramps-users] Report selection logic

[Edward C. <ec...@ya...>]

I have used gramps for years and I applaud and thank the developers for all of your/their effort. However, to me, at least, the logic change concerning the reports is a step backwards in usability. Previously, if I was actively working on a person and then clicked a report, it was intuitive that I am most likely to want that same person as the default selection for the report. With the new logic my currently active person is ignored and I must make an entirely new selection for the report. This adds effort and reduces usability.
Personally, I feel that intuitive usability is very important in a product and that this logic changes diminishes usability. Am I alone in feeling this way?