From: Doug B. <dou...@gm...> - 2010-08-16 12:05:26
|
On Mon, Aug 16, 2010 at 7:33 AM, Duncan Lithgow <dun...@gm...> wrote: > On 16 August 2010 01:11, Doug Blank <dou...@gm...> wrote: > ... >>> Also what is the difference between Descendant Report and DDR? What is the >>> difference Ancestor Report and DAR? > > This reminds me, have the devs discussed adding some usage tracking to > Gramps? I think it would be so useful to know, for example, how much > the different reports are used, which views get the most clicks etc. That is an interesting idea. If we added signals that get emitted through various places, it would be easy to build an addon that could collect and send data. That would also help us find underused parts of Gramps, and then allow us to find ways of making them more obvious, or just pointing them out to users. > At the moment we are doing a lot of development work based on a pretty > small sample of users all of whom are pretty it savvy and understand > Gramps pretty well. I guess I don't understand this point. There are tons of suggestions in the issue tracker about items that the vast user base have. Some are far out and others make a lot of sense. But I see that developers read these and implement or address them whenever they can. But yes, the developers themselves are a small sample size. -Doug > Anyway, as for the duplication in the reports, I think I would be > easier to just have the detailed report and people can turn off the > bits they don't use. But then I would say that because I never bother > with the non-detailed report. > > Duncan > > -- > 'The unconsidered life is not worth living' - Socrates > |