[Gramps-devel] Re : Relationship loops

[jerome <rom...@ya...>]

Hello,

> I wonder: does this make sense? I would expect a closer
> relationship in
> a line to invalidate all further relationships in the same
> line. Or,
> technically speaking, I guess I would expect the program to
> behave as if
> __crosslinks was never True.

I had made a feature request for a "Pedigree collapse, inbreeding" :
http://www.gramps-project.org/bugs/view.php?id=192

The function get_relationship_distance_new() called with all_families=True seems to be an alternative by displaying all possible lineages !

I find funny to know that I am the 15th uncle once removed of my first cousin ... And that my parents have a common ancestors  :-\


Regards,
Jérôme

--- En date de : Ven 25.9.09, Reinhard Müller <rei...@by...> a écrit :

> De: Reinhard Müller <rei...@by...>
> Objet: [Gramps-devel] Relationship loops
> À: gra...@li...
> Date: Vendredi 25 Septembre 2009, 9h23
> Dear developers,
> 
> please imagine the following situation:
> 
> 
> Great-Grandfather -(married)- Great-Grandmother
>                
>     /     \
>                
>    /       \
>                
>   /         \
>              
>    /       
>    \
>       Grandfather       
>      Grandmother
>               | 
>            
>    |
>               | 
>            
>    |
>               | 
>            
>    |
>               | 
>            
>    |
>            Father
> -(married)- Mother
>                
>     /     \
>                
>    /       \
>                
>   /         \
>              
>    /       
>    \
>          
>    Brother   
>    Sister
> 
> 
> So "Father" and "Mother" were cousins who married, and they
> have 2
> children, "Brother" and "Sister".
> 
> The function get_relationship_distance_new(), if called
> with
> all_families=True, will now tell you that "Sister" is
> "Brother"'s sister
> *and* his second cousin.
> 
> I wonder: does this make sense? I would expect a closer
> relationship in
> a line to invalidate all further relationships in the same
> line. Or,
> technically speaking, I guess I would expect the program to
> behave as if
> __crosslinks was never True.
> 
> Thanks,
> Reinhard
> 
> -----La pièce jointe associée suit-----
> 
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> Come build with us! The BlackBerry&reg; Developer
> Conference in SF, CA
> is the only developer event you need to attend this year.
> Jumpstart your
> developing skills, take BlackBerry mobile applications to
> market and stay 
> ahead of the curve. Join us from November 9-12, 2009.
> Register now!
> http://p.sf.net/sfu/devconf
> -----La pièce jointe associée suit-----
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Gramps-devel mailing list
> Gra...@li...
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/gramps-devel
>