Re: [Gramps-devel] Question about gramps.pot

[Jérôme <rom...@ya...>]

> If you do:
>  make gramps.po

sorry, typo :
  make gramps.pot

>  ran a make update-po

This will merge all .po files according to last template (gramps.pot)
If you just want to update sv.po, then maybe "make gramps.pot + 
msgmerge" commands will be quicker.


Jérôme

Jérôme a écrit :
> Peter,
> 
> I just added some third-party plugins references (Timeline quickview, 
> DenominoViso ...).
> As I tried to add them on fr.po, I commited modified gramps.pot, for 
> every translators who planned to add them too !
> 
> If you do:
>  make gramps.po
> then, process will just look at core modules (POTFILE.in) and will 
> remove this additional strings on new gramps.pot :)
> 
> msgmerge --no-wrap sv.po gramps.pot -o new_sv.po
> will revert your 226 fuzzy and 157 untranslated strings (like nine days 
> ago).
> 
> 
> Jérôme
> 
> Peter Landgren a écrit :
>>
>>
>> When I today, after a svn up in branch, ran a make update-po, my sv.po 
>> shows 226 fuzzy and 157 untranslated strings. Nine days ago it was 
>> only 18 untranslated? What has happened?
>>
>> /Peter
>>
>>
>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>>
>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ 
>>
>> Register Now & Save for Velocity, the Web Performance & Operations 
>> Conference from O'Reilly Media. Velocity features a full day of 
>> expert-led, hands-on workshops and two days of sessions from industry 
>> leaders in dedicated Performance & Operations tracks. Use code 
>> vel09scf and Save an extra 15% before 5/3. 
>> http://p.sf.net/sfu/velocityconf
>>
>>
>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Gramps-devel mailing list
>> Gra...@li...
>> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/gramps-devel
> 
>