Re: [Gramps-devel] XML: new dtd and rng files

[Benny M. <ben...@gm...>]

Zsolt, and Alex as our export

About the gramps xml schema, would it not be better to have in the ATTLIST
of tag name be a listed entry, instead of CDATA. So :
<!ATTLIST tag
    name    (bold|italic|underline|fontcolor|...) #REQUIRED
    value    CDATA #IMPLIED
>

I have no experience here, but if we see the XML as a standard, this is an
open door to other applications to add stuff which other apps do not
understand.

If only a specific number of names is understood by GRAMPS, then best to
list them in the XML so as to make clear what formatting is allowed, no?

Benny

2008/4/11, zsolt foldvari <zso...@gm...>:
>
> I've just checked in the new (1.3.0) version of DTD and RNG schema
> files, which now include the latest StyledText Notes.
>
> Could someone double check them please. This is how the XML for a note
> looks like now:
>
>     <note id="N0001" handle="_xxx" change="1207689768" type="General">
>       <text>clear text</text>
>       <tag name="bold">
>         <range start="0" end="1"/>
>         <range start="6" end="7"/>
>       </tag>
>       <tag name="fontcolor" value="#ef23c4">
>         <range start="1" end="5"/>
>       </tag>
>     </note>
>
> Cheers,
> Zsolt
>
> -------------------------------------------------------------------------
> This SF.net email is sponsored by the 2008 JavaOne(SM) Conference
> Don't miss this year's exciting event. There's still time to save $100.
> Use priority code J8TL2D2.
>
> http://ad.doubleclick.net/clk;198757673;13503038;p?http://java.sun.com/javaone
> _______________________________________________
> Gramps-devel mailing list
> Gra...@li...
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/gramps-devel
>