Re: [Gramps-devel] The GRAMPS 'Views'

[Rob G. H. <rob...@gm...>]

Dear Duncan:

    I agree with the seperation of the views.  It is more logical, and
it shows a seperation of views.

Sincerely Yours,
Rob

On Wed, 2008-02-06 at 09:15 +0100, Duncan Lithgow wrote:

> On Thu, 2008-01-31 at 22:27 +0100, Benny Malengier wrote:
> > Please, let's stop this talk of splitting the views quickly,
> > quickly, ... 
> 
> Hi Benny. I'm not quite sure what you think I've suggested, I'm only
> talking about a semantic separation, ie calling the navigator-views
> something different from all the others.
> 
> I think the separation is already clearly there in function and design,
> but it is not currently reflected in our menus, names or terminology.
> 
> Clearly these are all of the same type and function:
> Group 1.
> * People
> * Families
> * Events
> * Sources
> * Places
> * Media
> * Repositories
> * Notes
> 
> But these are something else:
> Group 2.
> * Gramplets
> * Relationships
> * Pedigree
> 
> Which file determines the order of the View icons? I thought i'd found
> it but nothing changed when reloading... I'd like to play around a bit
> locally.
> 
> Duncan
> -------------------------------------------------------------------------
> This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft
> Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2008.
> http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse0120000070mrt/direct/01/
> _______________________________________________ Gramps-devel mailing list Gra...@li... https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/gramps-devel