From: Rob G. H. <rob...@gm...> - 2008-02-15 01:08:51
|
Dear Jason: I would love to see a narrative stylesheet for two seperate examples. I know there is already a stylesheet for no styling, but there should be a very simple one and a very exhaustive styling where everything is shown as well. A giant website and a tiny website capability. Some people want to show everything and some want to show nothing. I think it should also depend upon if you are willing to risk showing everything to the internet masses or if you wish to be very private in the amount of data shown. I also like to have an exhaustive output which keep here locally on my personal computer outside of the reach of the internet populace... Sincerely Yours, Rob G. Healey On Wed, 2008-02-06 at 20:03 -0600, Jason Simanek wrote: > > If you just _add_ classes/ids to current markup, these add to the size of > > the exported site and some people have still size limited space for their > > genealogy pages. Are you using some default styling and leaving the > > class & id names only for special cases? > > So I was completely wrong on the file size issue. Please forgive me that > dumb response that was obviously not well thought out. In my experience > with commercial sites the process of replacing table-based layouts with > XHTML + CSS layouts yields a much smaller footprint. However, in the > Narrative Web case, the separation was already there for the most part. > At the same time the sites generated by this script have very little > styling or layout to them. They're very minimal. > > Eero is right, and if you all are programmers you already know this, > about my act of adding additional text increasing the file size. My > previous test was bad in two ways: comparing the older version of GRAMPS > to a newer version was a bad first step and I didn't look through each > file very closely. I was looking for victory and I found it. I needed a > better test and a more particular review of the file sizes. > > In order to keep it as simple as possible I have downloaded the most > recent GRAMPS 3.X and compiled it with the existing NarrativeWeb.py > > The results follow. I hope you feel that this is acceptable file growth. > If not, well, maybe compromising the readability of my id and class > names for brevity would be a good first step. > > -Simanek > > --------------------------------------------- > > File Size Comparison of Output from Existing NarrativeWeb.py and > Simanek's Proposed NarrativeWeb.py. > > > existing NarrativeWeb.py output > ---------------------------------- > /img/ 723.5 KB > /plc/ 631.4 KB > /ppl/ 5300.0 KB > /src/ 83.7 KB > /srn/ 665.3 KB > /contact.html 2.5 KB > /download.html 1.6 KB > /gallery.html 29.9 KB > /index.html 1.8 KB > /individuals.html 148.8 KB > /introduction.html 1.9 KB > /narrative.css 4.6 KB > /places.html 20.2 KB > /sources.html 3.2 KB > /surnames.html 15.2 KB > /surnames_count.html 15.0 KB > ---------------------------------- > TOTAL 7648.6 KB > > > > Simanek NarrativeWeb.py output > ---------------------------------- > /img/ 779.5 KB > /plc/ 656.0 KB > /ppl/ 5600.0 KB > /src/ 84.2 KB > /srn/ 748.6 KB > /contact.html 2.8 KB > /download.html 1.8 KB > /gallery.html 41.1 KB > /index.html 1.9 KB > /individuals 202.0 KB > /introduction.html 2.0 KB > /narrative.css 18.9 KB > /places.html 22.5 KB > /sources.html 3.7 KB > /surnames.html 19.3 KB > /surnames_count.html 19.9 KB > ---------------------------------- > TOTAL 8304.2 KB > > DIFFERENCE 655.6 KB + > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------- > This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft > Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2008. > http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse0120000070mrt/direct/01/ > _______________________________________________ > Gramps-devel mailing list > Gra...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/gramps-devel |