From: Benny M. <ben...@gm...> - 2008-02-07 19:52:33
|
2008/2/7, Jason Simanek <jsi...@gm...>: > > > I hope we're not talking about the change I recently made. I didn't > > alter the images. (Though that could be done.) > > > The HTML forces the browser to dynamically resize the image to a > > maximum of 800x600, but inserts a <a href="..."> so the user can get > > to the larger original. > > Staphane, this change (a smart one) would not affect the final file size > of the web output. If anything it would INCREASE the file size if those > images were being scaled previously. I was thinking that the compression > rates had been changed. > > On the other hand, the difference I saw in file size could very well > have to do with a change in my image references that excluded a range of > images on the new output. Point being that my experience isn't > necessarily without error. > > My main focus is really about the size of my HTML files remaining within > an acceptable range. Ok, the file size reduction on export is feature request: http://bugs.gramps-project.org/view.php?id=1178 Now we only need a developer to implement that. The code is mostly present in GRAMPS, we already make thumbnails, so that code could be reused. Benny |