From: <bm...@ca...> - 2007-10-04 12:54:14
|
Quoting Brian Matherly <br...@gr...>: > > What I do agree with is this: > > * Move all the Graphiz related reports under one category (which I've > already started working on) Yes! > > * Let's nitpick the names and make sure they describe the report as > well as possible. Yes! Good short names, always a problem in programming. The report tool called from toolbar could include an image. The top entry in the report menu could be this tool. I think many users don't know the toolbar button, and have never pressed on it. > * Add more context sensitive help to prompt the user. Indeed. Something else, we have some unsupported plugins, they should fit in any new categories created. Eg, I wrote something that generates a kml file usable in eg google earth. This is in code generators. Code generators is a bad name, but we need a category for these reports that write out a file (file.dot, file.kml, ...) with the intention of being processed by another application (even if we can do this processing on the fly in the background). However, please don't break the code registration api to much :-) ---------------------------------------------------------------- This message was sent using IMP, the Internet Messaging Program. |