Re: [Gramps-users] no parents (x: new member)

[<bm...@ca...>]

Quoting Michael Klinosky <mp...@en...>:

> I was contacted directly, and was told that 'Check and Repair Database'
> should fix the broken links. Granted, it found 12 broken child/family
> links. But, that person still has no parents listed in Pedigree.
>
> I checked more of the database - those parents, and a few others, have
> no children in the Family list.
>
> Looks like I have a lot of work to do.

I don't completely follow. Is GRAMPS now consistent, that is, do all 
views show
the same family?
You said first relationship view showed it, but pedigree not.

If part of GRAMPS would know they are family, you might be able to do 
something.
Otherwise, GEDCOM it is. However, on a small database, it might be easier to
correct things in GRAMPS.

You find some GEDCOM references on our wiki:
http://www.gramps-project.org/wiki/index.php?title=GEDCOM
Even link to how to convert ANSEL to Unicode

Benny

----------------------------------------------------------------
This message was sent using IMP, the Internet Messaging Program.