[Gramps-users] two small ideas

[N J. B. <ja...@xm...>]

Hi 

I have just discovered Gramps, so am jumping in with both feet. First
thing to say is, I like it.

Idea 1) When gramps has a date entered as the year only (1984) it stores
it as 1984-00-00. Fine, but why display it like that? Surely the zero
values could just be stripped off? Then it would be more obvious to the
eye that the date was less accurate.

Idea 2) When gramps (2.2.8, anyway) has a baptism but not a birth, it
uses the baptism date in the relationships view. Again fine, but there
ought to be some indication, such as "bap. 1940-05-20" as opposed to 
"b. 1940-04-10". 

Question: is there a difference between a baptism and a christening?

-- 
N James Bridge          http://www.xmas.demon.co.uk