From: Alex R. <sh...@gr...> - 2005-12-20 16:24:08
|
Benny, On Tue, 2005-12-20 at 10:21 +0100, Benny.Malengier@UGent.be wrote: > General question: is the template.po in CVS ok for 2.0.9, or is this a ve= rsion > with the present development cycle? I'm not yet understanding the tags=20 > and such in CVS. Tags in CVS are of two kinds: regular tags and branch tags. There are quite a few branches in the CVS now, but for all practical purposes you need just two branches (if not one). One is HEAD, it requires no branch tag to be specified at checkout, as this the default branch, latest and greatest, our development version. Mighty broken at the moment for any user work. Another one is 'gramps20' branch -- this is the stable 2.0.x tree. The 2.0.x releases are made through it. To check that one out, you need to specify '-r gramps20' at the checkout time: $ cvs -d <cvs_root> co -r gramps20 gramps2 More about branches and tags of CVS: $ info cvs branch "branches and revisions" > Is the Italian translator on this list? I see a creation date in the it.p= o of > 2003 so is nobody working on this anymore? Lorenzo was not active for a long time, that's true. > I'm going to Italy for the end of the year and want to do input in Italia= n. If > too much English strings are present I would do msmerge with the template= .po > and do some translations. I could also make a dates file while there. Let= me > know if somebody else is working on this. I don't know and don't think that somebody is working on that. If you do that, make sure to get template.po from 2.0.9. > Is the Dutch translator on this list? I see revisions up to 10/11/2005=20 > but there has been no merge with the 2.0.9 code. Is this planned? That revision was mine, correcting the typo in %s. The last real revision was done by Tino Meinen on Aug 12, 2005.=20 Alex --=20 Alexander Roitman http://www.gramps-project.org |