From: Alex R. <sh...@gr...> - 2006-10-31 05:59:34
|
I think this may enjoy the discussion between the users of gramps, not just the developers. Forwarding to the gramps-users, Alex -------- Forwarded Message -------- > From: Steve Hall <dig...@da...> > To: GRAMPS Devel <gra...@li...> > Subject: [Gramps-devel] Family View > Date: Tue, 31 Oct 2006 00:22:33 -0500 >=20 > Per the discussions on irc.freenode.net#gramps tonight, I'd like to > request the traditional Family View. Ages ago, I did a mockup for one: >=20 > http://www.dancingpaper.com/gramps-ui/familyview-2005-03-12.png >=20 > However, with the new GTK+ interface, it might start with something > like: >=20 > http://www.dancingpaper.com/gramps-ui/family-view_2006-10-30.png >=20 > and then add a few more tidbits like places and Father/Mother marrige: >=20 > Father > . b. date, place > . m. date, place > . d. date, place > Mother > . b. date, place > . d. date, place >=20 > . Siblings: > . . Child 1 > . . . b. date, place > . . . d. date, place >=20 > . . Child 2 > . . . b. date, place > . . . d. date, place >=20 >=20 > As I got into this, I realized that the "hyperlinked name" convention > in Relationship view isn't at all obvious. Clicking on a name appears > that it will lead to more detailed information about that person, not > navigation to another generation. (And if so, which one.) >=20 > So I would also propose that the navigation system from Pedigree view > be used here. Then, clicking on an individual opens them for editing. > There are some other similar inconsistencies on this line, but that's > probably enough for tonight. :) >=20 >=20 --=20 Alexander Roitman http://www.gramps-project.org |