Re: [Gpsbabel-code] Skytraq module. Was:: backlog of gpsbabel patches

[Martin M. <mar...@gm...>]

Hi Robert,

from my point of view the patch from Mathias looks like a reasonable
first implementation for gpsbabel. While it did not work in all
scenarios for me, it was a solution which did at least partly work.

Generally I think it is a good idea to start adding skytraq support now,
as this might help to improve the situation. Nevertheless, I'd expect
some bug reports regarding skytraq devices.

regards,
Martin


On Sat, 2009-07-04 at 18:01 -0500, Robert Lipe wrote:
> So it Mathais' patch from 2009-02-10 the favorite one?   I'd sure like
> to hear that from Mathais and/or Martin.
> 
> RJL
> 
> 2009/6/11 Jean-Christophe Haessig
> <jea...@di...>
>         Le jeudi 11 juin 2009 à 14:22 -0500, Robert Lipe a écrit :
>         Hello,
>         
>         I got busy with other suff and I didn’t check the list lately,
>         sorry...
>         
>         > There wasn't a clear "winner" that was obvious enough for me
>         to be the
>         > Chosen One and submit it.   (Mathias, Jean-Christophe,
>         Martin, and
>         > others involved are free to set my Bozo Bit at this point,
>         tell me I'm
>         > a doofus, and send me a "final" version before mocking my
>         competence
>         > as the Chief Babelhead.)    So I never actually commited any
>         of them.
>         
>         
>         AFAIR, Mathias merged the interesting stuff from my patch in
>         his, which
>         he published on 2009-02-10.
>         I coded that because I needed to read my unit quickly, and
>         until now I
>         left it in a "worksforme" state. Moreover I added stuff to
>         setup the
>         unit which doesn’t have its place in Gpsbabel and wich were
>         left out
>         since a standalone app exists for that purpose.
>         
>         I think you can leave me out as a "competitor" for now ;)
>         
>         JC
>         
>