From: Andreas L. <no...@sb...> - 2002-03-30 18:26:24
|
On Sat, 2002-03-30 at 18:11, Eric Bezault wrote: > Andreas Leitner wrote: > > > > One more thing: I see you commented out the test that currently fail. > > Wouldn't it be better to leave them in as a steady reminder? Maybe > > getest can be modified to inlcude a flag for a test with options like: > > > > 1) this test should work, if it doesn't its a regression and somebody > > broke code > > 2) this test should not yet work, it's know to break. if it does, > > somebody implemented the missing feature - hurray (; > > And I guess that you would like to have new entries in the > test summary next to "Passed:", "Failed:" and "Aborted:" to > indicate how many of these tests still fail and how many > now work (and hence can be moved to the regular test > category). > > I'm not sure yet how to implement that in 'getest' in an > elegant way (i.e. without making it harder to write > regular tests when there is no such beasts), but I'll > think about it. That would be reall nice of course (; Andreas |