From: Colin P. A. <co...@co...> - 2007-02-12 08:05:11
|
>>>>> "Eric" == Eric Bezault <er...@go...> writes: Eric> Colin Paul Adams wrote: >>>>>>> "Colin" == Colin Paul Adams <co...@co...> >>>>>>> writes: Colin> For XML 1.1, the equivalent to \c is 3830417 bytes long. Colin> This is definitely too big, so something is wrong with the Colin> test program. >> No. What is wrong is that this figure includes all as yet >> unallocated code-points (barring a few excluded ones). For XML >> 1.0, the figure is 104080. Either way, the strings are too >> long Eric> You're probably right. On the other hand is it that big Eric> compared to what you have generated in the classes Eric> ST_UNICODE_VNNN_*_ROUTINES? Yes. Because the latter are direct access (looking up values in an array), whereas the former requires a search of the entire string (in the worst case of no match). -- Colin Adams Preston Lancashire |