From: Robert K. <rl...@al...> - 2009-03-30 00:48:22
|
I'm working on the R2880. Seems to be a very nice printer. Based on what I'm seeing, I think the R2400 (and possibly also the 2100/2200) is probably badly mistuned. It likely isn't printing dark enough, and it also looks like the best gray is generated with no composite component at all -- just black, light black, and light light black. It's actually harder to spot drops (using a 5x loupe) with only the grayscale inks than with composite. The question I have -- and I'd like to get people's opinions on it -- is whether we go back and retune it, which will break any existing profiles. There are a few possible options: 1) If we do another 5.2 release (and I'd like to), we update the tuning at that time. 2) We update the tuning at the next minor release (5.3), whenever that is. 3) We don't update the tuning at all. 4) We add another printer definition for the retuned R2400. I'm not particularly enamored of either (3) or (4). (3) permanently locks us into inferior quality, while (4) just creates confusion. What I don't know is how disruptive it will be to change tunings during a stable release series, even if it turns out that the current settings are grossly inferior and simply can't print dark enough. Thoughts? BTW, all of this happens just through changing the XML files -- no cource code changes, and I don't think that it will even be reflected in the PPD files. |