Re: [Fwd: Re: [ggc-development] svn]

[Dieter S. <sc...@ch...>]

Aleksander Rozman wrote:
> Reinhold Rumberger wrote:

>> Downsides of svn are some lacking functionality compared to cvs (does 
>> this project need this?) and relatively bad integration into eclipse.

Have you checked 'subclipse' [1]? I use it on a regular basis and it has
all I want.

> When SF will say, that projects need to be converted then we can do it, 
> but for now it's not needed.

I would agree with Andy here. As long as cvs works, I think there is no
need to switch (and loose the history data so far).

I really like svn, and I'm happily using it on new projects, but I don't
think a switch is needed.

--dieter

[1] http://subclipse.tigris.org/