From: xavier l. <lho...@gm...> - 2015-03-23 21:08:05
|
Hi ok I submitted issue #318. It will be the occasion to to work on #297 and closed #222. But It will takes some time. I can only work at nigth... xl 2015-03-23 21:48 GMT+01:00 Kevin Smith <ks...@bo...>: > Yes, that would be a good start. An even better one would be to create an > improvement ticket in the bug tracker, then make the pull request. If we do > backport it, 1.7.1 would be scheduled to go out in mid April. > > Since you seem to be our current expert on the topic of ArcGIS Cache, you > might want to take a look at another PR regarding the ArcGIS Cache support > https://github.com/GeoWebCache/geowebcache/pull/310 There's some > uncertainty whether the behaviour in question is something that varies > between ArcGIS caches and therefor need to be configurable, or if the > current behaviour in GWC is just wrong. Any input would be welcome. At > the moment I'm holding off on merging it until it's made configurable and > unit tests are added. > > > > On 23 March 2015 at 12:46, xavier lhomme <lho...@gm...> wrote: > >> Hi kevin and community >> >> I agree that it's not a regression ! >> >> Is it possible to produce a 1.7.1 version with the ArcGIS Cache (compact >> or exploded) compliant with the ArcGIS Server 10.1 or above ? >> Then with the "ximex" code ? that we can find here >> https://github.com/GeoWebCache/geowebcache/pull/223 >> Note that in the "Geowebcache-users Digest, Vol 80, Issue 5" mail from >> the beginning of the month Ole Kofoed Pedersen had the same issue. then >> it's really a need. >> >> Do you want that I create a Pull Request in the master branch with the >> ximex code ? >> >> 2015-03-23 20:01 GMT+01:00 Kevin Smith <ks...@bo...>: >> >>> Hi Xavier, >>> >>> It looks to me like you may have been using a patched custom build of >>> GWC since I can't find any sign of SpatialReference.LatestWKID in any of >>> the 1.6.x, 1.7.x, or master. SpatialReference hasn't been touched on any >>> of those branches since the initial commit. >>> >>> The revert was because ximax had submitted the PR against the 1.5.x >>> branch. I hadn't noticed that it wasn't going into master and merged it, >>> then reverted to correct my mistake. I think I emailed ximax to ask >>> for a revised PR to master (At least that's what I should have done). >>> Doing it that way is important in order to avoid precisely the sort of >>> regression where a new version lacks a previously introduced feature. >>> Since it was only ever on the 1.5.x branch, it had no effect on 1.6.x or >>> 1.7.x. >>> >>> Could you download a new 1.6 WAR from SourceForge and try that? I think >>> the error will still occur, indicating that this is not a regression in the >>> community codebase but rather a patch you applied to your instance. >>> >>> On 21 March 2015 at 06:45, xavier lhomme <lho...@gm...> >>> wrote: >>> >>>> Hi kevin >>>> >>>> I'm using ArcGIS Compact Cache with GeoWebCache (generated with ArcGIS >>>> Server >= 10.1) >>>> With ArcGIS 10.1 or above some parameters have been added in the >>>> conf.xml file like LatestWKID ... >>>> >>>> ximax has proposed in "Commits on Jan 29, 2014" a patch which you merge >>>> first. #223 >>>> But you revert this merge on 15 Jul 2014 >>>> >>>> Perhaps you do this to ensure backward compatibility with configuration >>>> file from ArcGIS 10.0 or 9.3 ? >>>> >>>> Is it possible to produce a 1.7.1 version with this patch ? >>>> >>>> xav >>>> >>> >>> >>> >>> -- >>> >>> Kevin Smith >>> >>> Software Engineer | Boundless <http://boundlessgeo.com/> >>> >>> ks...@bo... >>> >>> +1-778-785-7459 >>> >>> @boundlessgeo <http://twitter.com/boundlessgeo/> >>> >>> >>> <http://twitter.com/boundlessgeo/> >>> >>> [image: http://boundlessgeo.com/] >>> <http://boundlessgeo.com/> >>> >> >> > > > -- > > Kevin Smith > > Software Engineer | Boundless <http://boundlessgeo.com/> > > ks...@bo... > > +1-778-785-7459 > > @boundlessgeo <http://twitter.com/boundlessgeo/> > > > <http://twitter.com/boundlessgeo/> > > [image: http://boundlessgeo.com/] > <http://boundlessgeo.com/> > |