From: Arne K. <ar...@ti...> - 2011-02-18 16:08:14
|
+1 , though maybe we've also just been too stingy on the 1.Xs. -Arne On 2/18/11 12:02 PM, Gabriel Roldan wrote: > Hey, > > since we don't really have stable/development branches but just > trunk/master, > and there are (GeoServer and OG Suite) builds that depend on them, I > think it'd be good to > name snapshot versions up to the "revision" number, like in > 1.2.5-SNAPSHOT > instead of 1.2-SNAPSHOT. > Otherwise it gets too difficult to change almost anything in master > without breaking > those builds. This way I think we could at least guarantee builds > depending on a.b.c-SNAPSHOT > won't break by changes on a.b.d-SNAPSHOT, and it will also be easier > to keep those builds > that really depend on the latest and greatest sync'ed up (say, > GeoServer trunk can keep up but > GeoServer 2.1.x doesn't need to). > > Thoughts? ok to make the change? other ideas? > > Cheers, > Gabriel > > -- > Gabriel Roldan > OpenGeo - http://opengeo.org > Expert service straight from the developers. |