From: Eli D. L. <e.d...@sm...> - 2005-05-18 13:39:26
|
Hi, I was just wondering (**hoping**) that the WFS bits are stable enough to use? I'm only asking because I just realized that they don't exist in the current stable release and seem to have been introduced in the current dev. branch of the code. I'm looking to make some client-side WFS requests to an installation of GeoServer. Thanks. |
From: Chris H. <ch...@op...> - 2005-05-18 14:12:06
|
They're pretty solid. udig - http://udig.refractions.net uses them for its wfs communications. And we're moving the dev branch into stability, should have an rc out relatively soon. There won't be major api changes, and if you find bugs we will do our best to fix them quickly. So I'd say go for it. Chris On Wed, 18 May 2005, Eli Dylan Lorimer wrote: > Hi, > > I was just wondering (**hoping**) that the WFS bits are stable enough > to use? I'm only asking because I just realized that they don't exist > in the current stable release and seem to have been introduced in the > current dev. branch of the code. I'm looking to make some client-side > WFS requests to an installation of GeoServer. > > Thanks. > > > ------------------------------------------------------- > This SF.Net email is sponsored by Oracle Space Sweepstakes > Want to be the first software developer in space? > Enter now for the Oracle Space Sweepstakes! > http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=7412&alloc_id=16344&op=click > _______________________________________________ > Geotools-gt2-users mailing list > Geo...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/geotools-gt2-users > -- |