From: Jody G. <jga...@re...> - 2007-01-30 22:26:27
|
The problem has been discussed, via email. The page currently is incomplete .. Specific questions: Proposal Type: is this not simply an improvement? Ie defining a mock configuration, and then using it to produce test cases? Implementation - the details indicate that a mock geoserver instance will be needed. How many classes must be stubbed? I understand the answer depends on how the configuration proposal goes ... can we have an answer either way? - could we not implement this against a default configuration? Packaged in a zip file in the usual manner? But only used when running the test cases,,, Risks: Having to adjust to a different configuration abstraction seems to be the major risk (enough that you would like this work scheduled afterwords). Do we have any risks in terms of QA? Cheers, Jody |