From: Martin D. <mar...@no...> - 2005-11-23 21:41:17
|
Landon Blake a =E9crit : > I have examined the Javadoc for the=20 > Geometry Package, and it appears to be modeled after the GML 3.0 spec.=20 > Is this correct? Yes. Or to be more accurate, the geometry packages are modeled after ISO=20 19107, and GML 3.0 is modeled after ISO 19107 too, which explain why=20 they looks similar (which is intended). Similary, the referencing packages are modeled after ISO 19111. A new=20 set of coverage packages modeled after ISO 19123 are in progress=20 (available only in the "pending" directory for now; not yet in any=20 official release). Martin. |