Re: [Algorithms] lighting
Brought to you by:
vexxed72
From: Neil M. <bi...@me...> - 2001-12-03 00:32:28
|
>There is no need for pessimism -- CG is moving faster than any of us = would really like, I think. =20 It's not pessimistic to expect more Video-diversity in games. =20 >No time to truly appreciate even what we have today. I most certainly appreciate the power we have - after all, one hasn't = suffered until they have programmed graphics on the bit-plane = architecture of the EGA card in 80x86 Assembly. =20 Neil McLaughlin ----- Original Message -----=20 From: Adam Moravanszky=20 To: gda...@li...=20 Sent: Sunday, December 02, 2001 12:51 PM Subject: Re: [Algorithms] lighting > by the way just what does the NP stand for? Nondeterministic polynomial time is the formal definition. It is = sometimes convenient to just think "nonpolynomial" (=3D=3D exponential) though, = because thats how much work you end up doing on a computer. >Could the eventual solution to VR be something radically different or = will it be the same old thing with more GigaHertz and >Bandwidth? Will = True Virtual Reality just be Quake 10? VR will need the appropriate hardware. The best images are worth = nothing if the interface (monitor, mouse) stays 2D and clumsy. There is no need for pessimism -- CG is moving faster than any of us = would really like, I think. No time to truly appreciate even what we have = today. -- -- Adam Moravanszky http://n.ethz.ch/student/adammo/ _______________________________________________ GDAlgorithms-list mailing list GDA...@li... https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/gdalgorithms-list |