Re: [gate-users] JAPE Rule to detect ontology class of annotation

[ilker k. <ilk...@gm...>]

Dear Phil and GATErs,

I am trying to prepare generic rule that finds all instances of all classes
of ontology. (my aim was to prevent writing a rule for each class). I tried
the rule below after suggestion, but it gives errors. What is the problem
with the JAPE rule below, and is it possible to prepare a rule to find
instances of all classes of the ontology?


------------------------
Phase: OntoMatching
Input: Lookup
Options: control = appelt

Rule: PersonLookup
(
  {Lookup.class}
):thing
-->
:thing.Mention = {class = :thing.Lookup.class, inst = :thing.Lookup.inst}
------------------------

Regards,

Ilker.

On Mon, Sep 13, 2010 at 2:17 PM, ilker karcı <ilk...@gm...> wrote:

> Dear Diana, Thank you for the URL, it seems I just missed it.
>
> Dear Phil, I will try the solution you suggested asap (when I return back
> to home after work)
>
> Regards,
>
> Ilker.
>
>
> On Mon, Sep 13, 2010 at 2:11 PM, Diana Maynard <d.m...@dc...>wrote:
>
>> H Ilker
>> The slides and material are all available on the web for the September
>> course.
>> http://gate.ac.uk/wiki/TrainingCourseAug2010/
>> While the topic of module 9 is the same as that of the previous course in
>> May (module 10), the contents are a little different and are more up to
>> date.
>> Diana
>>
>>
>> On 13/09/10 12:09, ilker karcı wrote:
>>
>>> Dear Diana,
>>>
>>> I have been following the pages for the training in Montreal in September
>>> 2010, but there are not any slides or code samples on the web yet. (I
>>> apologise if I am missing sth, I was thinking they will be available after
>>> the training.)
>>>
>>> Besides, on http://gate.ac.uk/family/training.html , Module 9 includes
>>> "Semantic Annotation with GATE" but on the URL
>>> http://gate.ac.uk/conferences/training-modules.html#track3 same topics
>>> are under "Module 10: Ontologies and Semantic Annotation".
>>>
>>> Anyway, I have glanced over ontology support in GATE 6.0 shortly. I am
>>> interested in the topics like relation extraction, measuring & evaluating
>>> our methods etc.
>>>
>>> Thanks for your information.
>>>
>>> Regards,
>>>
>>> Ilker.
>>>
>>> On Mon, Sep 13, 2010 at 1:53 PM, Diana Maynard <d.m...@dc...<mailto:
>>> d.m...@dc...>> wrote:
>>>
>>>    Hi Ilker
>>>    Some things have changed recently in the implementation. I suggest you
>>>    follow the examples and slides from the more recent August/September
>>>    training course rather than the May one (see Module 9 for
>>>    ontologies and
>>>    semantic annotation). Make sure you use the latest version of GATE
>>>    also
>>>    for this (6.0-beta-1)
>>>    Regards
>>>    Diana
>>>
>>>
>>>    On 13/09/10 11:32, ilker karcı wrote:
>>>    > Dear All,
>>>    >
>>>    > I downloaded the GATE training files (May 2010) and implemented the
>>>    > "hands on" examples. For module 10 (ontologies and semantic
>>>    > annotation), I have some questions regarding Hands-On 5.
>>>    >
>>>    > 1 - ANNIE PRs gets tokens, words etc from the text document.
>>>    > 2 - OntoRootGazetteer & FlexibleGazetteer dynamically creates a list
>>>    > from the given ontology.
>>>    > 3 - When we run the pipeline defined, this list is matched with our
>>>    > text and we get an annotated document.
>>>    > 4 - To specialize the annotations, we use JAPE rules. So, instead of
>>>    > all annotations are "Test", we may have the annotation "Leader" for
>>>    > the instances of Leader class of ontology.
>>>    >
>>>    > My question is about the forth step. Do I have to manually write a
>>>    > JAPE rule for "each" class of ontology? Or is there a way to have a
>>>    > generic rule for that. Below is the JAPE rule for Hands-On 5
>>>    example.
>>>    >
>>>    > 1// Phase: OntoMatching
>>>    > 2// Input: Lookup
>>>    > 3// Options: control = appelt
>>>    > 4// Rule: PersonLookup
>>>    > 5// (
>>>    > 6// {Lookup.class == Person}
>>>    > 7// ):person
>>>    > 8// -->
>>>    > 9// :person.Mention = {class = :person.Lookup.class, inst =
>>>    > :person.Lookup.inst}
>>>    >
>>>    > I was just thinking if it is possible to use something like
>>>    > "Lookup.type(?) = Class" on line 6. So on the RHS I can have a Java
>>>    > code which loops all classes and annotates the annotation with the
>>>    > class name instead of "Test". Is it possible to have a generic rule
>>>    > like that?
>>>    >
>>>    > Kind Regards,
>>>    >
>>>    > Ilker.
>>>    >
>>>    >
>>>    >
>>>
>>>  ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>    > Start uncovering the many advantages of virtual appliances
>>>    > and start using them to simplify application deployment and
>>>    > accelerate your shift to cloud computing
>>>    > http://p.sf.net/sfu/novell-sfdev2dev
>>>    >
>>>    >
>>>    >
>>>    > _______________________________________________
>>>    > GATE-users mailing list
>>>    > GAT...@li...
>>>    <mailto:GAT...@li...>
>>>
>>>    > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/gate-users
>>>    >
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>  ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>    Start uncovering the many advantages of virtual appliances
>>>    and start using them to simplify application deployment and
>>>    accelerate your shift to cloud computing
>>>    http://p.sf.net/sfu/novell-sfdev2dev
>>>    _______________________________________________
>>>    GATE-users mailing list
>>>    GAT...@li...
>>>    <mailto:GAT...@li...>
>>>
>>>    https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/gate-users
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
>