Re: [Fwbuilder-discussion] Do we need Fedora Core 9 binary rpms?
Brought to you by:
mikehorn
From: Vadim K. <va...@vk...> - 2009-02-02 22:33:06
|
On Feb 2, 2009, at 1:48 PM, Tom Diehl wrote: > On Sat, 31 Jan 2009, Vadim Kurland wrote: > >> >> I want to retire my Fedora Core 9 virtual machine and build only FC10 >> rpms instead. Any objections ? As a compensation I should be able to >> build 64bit fc10 rpms :-) > > Since I seem to be the only person on the list running FC9, I guess > I can > build them myself if needed. Right now I am running the FC9 rpms on > both > an FC9 i386(my laptop) and FC10 x86_64 machine without problems. > I wonder if my fc10 rpms would install on fc9 machine ? > Instead of maintaining all of the virtual machines, have you > considered > just building the rpms in mock? That way one 64 bit machine can > build whatever > distro/arch you need. At least for Fedora/RHEL/Centos. Not sure how > the static > qt4 thing would do in mock but it should build like anything else > given the > correct pieces. this is interesting, where can I read about it ? Could you send some urls my way ? Even is static qt4 build has to stay on its own virtual machine, the ability to consolidate the rest would be nice. --vk |