Re: [Fwbuilder-discussion] -j ROUTE --OIF option
Brought to you by:
mikehorn
From: Dennis P. <li...@sh...> - 2007-07-26 14:11:12
|
Not sure if i am marking correctly... I choose the source ip net for which i want to mark and route and put it into the source part of the rule. For action i then select mark. Under mark i have three options: 1) the mark id: I selected 1 2) Mark connections that are created by packets that match rule (not sure about this one) 3) Mark in PREROUTING chain. (I had this selected as well) Options 2 and 3 I am not so sure about. Option 3, I think should be selected, make sense..kind of... Am I correct? What about option 2 should it be selected? I tried the about in different combinations but it broke my routing. This is what i want , for all servers in the DMZ i want it to go out throug= h a single interface. The rest of connections, i want it to be routed via an ECMP route. Can this be done....i think so....somds like a fairly not-so-complex setup but i may be wrong. This is how i went about trying to do what I want to: I deleted any default outgoing routes. I created a new routing table called outside1 and set up a route through it as follows ip route add default nexthop via x.x.x.9 dev eth2 table outside1 then I added the fwmark rule ip rule add from all fwmark 1 table outside1 For testing, I did not bother about add the ECMP route as yet, but that would be in another table and any ips that are !dmz net would be marked with 2 and I planned to add a fwmark rule to route appropriately. Did not quite get it to work successfully. Will try again... Vadim Kurland =E2=9C=89 wrote: >=20 >=20 > On Jul 24, 2007, at 3:46 PM, denpun wrote: >=20 >> >> Sorry for the late reply..had a longer than usual weekend.... >> >> About the marking..... >> I have set up ecmp by simply creating 4 default rules int he =20 >> routing tab. >> >> I am not sure but, do i need to do any marking along with ECMP for =20 >> things to >> work properly? I thought that ECMp would work without any marking??? >> >=20 > you should not need to mark packets for ECMP routing (Equal Cost =20 > Multi Path). >=20 >=20 >> Apart from the ECMP, I will need to do marking anyways to route =20 >> packets from >> the mailserver in the dmz out through the one single interface and not >> choose path based on ECMP. Will be doing that later today and i =20 >> think it >> should work. Will try it and let you know. >> >=20 > please do, this is interesting. >=20 > --vk >=20 >=20 >> >> >> Vadim Kurland =E2=9C=89 wrote: >>> >>> >>> could you mark packets using iptables rules and then do policy-based >>> routing using these marks ? >>> >>> --vk >>> >>> On Jul 20, 2007, at 2:32 PM, denpun wrote: >>> >>>> >>>> Greetings, >>>> As I mentioned earlier, I recompiled the kernel with the P-O-M >>>> patches and >>>> it seems that the route target options becomes available. I however >>>> cant >>>> seem to get it to work and have resorted to setting up routes via >>>> iproute >>>> instead. The reason for me switching over is not just because I >>>> could not >>>> get it to work with the -j Route target but also because I switched >>>> over to >>>> a load balancing (ECMP) setup instead of source based routing. >>>> Just though I'd share this with everyone. >>>> >>>> >>>> denpun wrote: >>>>> >>>>> Still not sure exactly what the problem is..... >>>>> Tried the same rule on another Debain Etch Machine with latest >>>>> updated >>>>> kernel 2.6.18-6 and still no luck... >>>>> So not sure if it is an iptables problem. I think it is more a =20 >>>>> kernel >>>>> problem; as in, the route option has not been modified into the >>>>> default >>>>> etch kernel. >>>>> I might be wrong... >>>>> but from what im reading dont you have to patch the kernel with >>>>> Patch-O-Matic(P-O-M) patches for the route option? >>>>> http://www.netfilter.org/projects/patch-o-matic/pom-extra.html >>>>> >>>>> The iptables installtion might support it but the kernel does not i >>>>> guess... >>>>> and also..the man pages says this.. >>>>> ROUTE >>>>> This is used to explicitly override the core network >>>>> stack=E2=80=99s >>>>> routing >>>>> decision. >>>>> >>>>> (Please note: This target requires kernel support that >>>>> might >>>>> not be >>>>> available in official Linux kernel sources or Debian=E2=80=99s >>>>> packaged >>>>> Linux >>>>> kernel sources. And if support for this target is >>>>> available for >>>>> the >>>>> specific Linux kernel source version, that support might >>>>> not be >>>>> enabled >>>>> in the current Linux kernel binary.) >>>>> Will try and apply P-O-M patches later on and see how it goes... >>>>> >>>>> What linux do you use for it to work. I guess it enabled by >>>>> default in >>>>> other distros. No one else here has had any problems with route? >>>>> I'm sure >>>>> many here use Debian Etch..or maybe not... :) >>>>> >>>>> anyways..thanks for all the help... >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> Vadim Kurland =E2=9C=8E wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> On Jul 19, 2007, at 7:35 AM, denpun wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Sorry forgot to tell you about it...last post... >>>>>>> Yes, the man page for iptables does list the route target and oif >>>>>>> options. >>>>>>> Im using Debian Etch with kernel 2.6.18-4 >>>>>>> >>>>>>> You think this problem has something to do with >>>>>>> CONFIG_IP_ROUTE_MULTIPATH_CACHED being enabled in Etch. Do a >>>>>>> search on >>>>>>> google for CONFIG_IP_ROUTE_MULTIPATH_CACHED and debain etch =20 >>>>>>> and the >>>>>>> routing >>>>>>> problems it has caused. >>>>>>> Do you think it has something to do with that? >>>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> no, I do not think so, option CONFIG_IP_ROUTE_MULTIPATH_CACHED is >>>>>> not >>>>>> for iptables >>>>>> >>>>>> --vk >>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Vadim Kurland =E2=9C=8E wrote: >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> On Jul 19, 2007, at 5:45 AM, denpun wrote: >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> I am running Debian Etch which is supposedly running a stable >>>>>>>>> version of >>>>>>>>> iptables, actually its 1.3.6. >>>>>>>>> You still think it could be an iptables problem? >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> what does the man page for iptables say ? Does it list ROUTE >>>>>>>> target ? >>>>>>>> If yes, and iptables does not accept this target, then =20 >>>>>>>> iptables is >>>>>>>> broken. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> While searching the list archives I also found this >>>>>>>>> http://www.nabble.com/action-route-in-fwbuilder-with-=20 >>>>>>>>> ubuntu-6.10- >>>>>>>>> tf3553920.html#a9925579 >>>>>>>>> Do you think its related? >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> the error message reported there was different, although also >>>>>>>> related >>>>>>>> to the ROUTE target. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> --vk >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Vadim Kurland =E2=9C=8E wrote: >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> On Jul 18, 2007, at 3:50 PM, denpun wrote: >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> My rules look like >>>>>>>>>>> $IPTABLES -N Out_RULE_1 -t mangle >>>>>>>>>>> $IPTABLES -t mangle -A POSTROUTING -o eth2 -s =20 >>>>>>>>>>> 10.1.0.0/16 -j >>>>>>>>>>> Out_RULE_1 >>>>>>>>>>> $IPTABLES -t mangle -A Out_RULE_1 -j LOG --log-level info >>>>>>>>>>> --log- >>>>>>>>>>> prefix >>>>>>>>>>> "RULE 1 -- ROUTE " >>>>>>>>>>> #$IPTABLES -t mangle -A Out_RULE_1 -j ROUTE --oif eth3 --gw >>>>>>>>>>> 200.32.233.81 >>>>>>>>>>> --continue >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> off the four of them, i comment them out one by one and it >>>>>>>>>>> looks >>>>>>>>>>> like it >>>>>>>>>>> errors out on the last/fourth rule >>>>>>>>>>> $IPTABLES -t mangle -A Out_RULE_1 -j ROUTE --oif eth3 --gw >>>>>>>>>>> 200.32.233.81 >>>>>>>>>>> --continue >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> must i have a special module enable for this to work or >>>>>>>>>>> something >>>>>>>>>>> or is it >>>>>>>>>>> available by default in the kernel. >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> Try "man iptables" on the firewall and see if target ROUTE is >>>>>>>>>> listed >>>>>>>>>> and if it has option --oif. If man page says it is there, and >>>>>>>>>> iptables errors out on this command, this looks like broken >>>>>>>>>> iptables >>>>>>>>>> installation. Unfortunately I do not know how this can be =20 >>>>>>>>>> fixed, >>>>>>>>>> short of recompiling iptables. >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> --vk >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> Vadim Kurland =E2=9C=8E wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> On Jul 18, 2007, at 3:40 PM, denpun wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> Sorry..actually i just noticed something..... >>>>>>>>>>>>> I made one small change to the rule by adding direction.... >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> $IPTABLES -N Out_RULE_1 -t mangle >>>>>>>>>>>>> $IPTABLES -t mangle -A POSTROUTING -o eth2 -s >>>>>>>>>>>>> 10.1.0.0/16 -j >>>>>>>>>>>>> Out_RULE_1 >>>>>>>>>>>>> $IPTABLES -t mangle -A Out_RULE_1 -j LOG --log-level >>>>>>>>>>>>> info -- >>>>>>>>>>>>> log- >>>>>>>>>>>>> prefix >>>>>>>>>>>>> "RULE 1 -- ROUTE " >>>>>>>>>>>>> $IPTABLES -t mangle -A Out_RULE_1 -j ROUTE --oif eth3 -- >>>>>>>>>>>>> continue >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> I get the following error...... >>>>>>>>>>>>> iptables: No chain/target/match by that name >>>>>>>>>>>>> i commented out the code and the error goes away.. >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> which iptables command you get this error for ? >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> I also reverted to back what I had..which is what i >>>>>>>>>>>>> originally >>>>>>>>>>>>> had...which >>>>>>>>>>>>> is what i posted earlier... >>>>>>>>>>>>> the error is still there... >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> -----------------------------------------------------------= =20 >>>>>>>>>>>>> -- >>>>>>>>>>>>> --- >>>>>>>>>>>>> The rule gets applied fine..without any problems... >>>>>>>>>>>>> The log reads as follows... >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> Jul 18 16:29:39 janus kernel: RULE 8 -- ACCEPT IN=3Deth1 >>>>>>>>>>>>> OUT=3Deth2 >>>>>>>>>>>>> SRC=3D10.1.200.201 DST=3D64.233.167.99 LEN=3D40 TOS=3D0x00 = =20 >>>>>>>>>>>>> PREC=3D0x00 >>>>>>>>>>>>> TTL=3D10 >>>>>>>>>>>>> ID=3D45690 >>>>>>>>>>>>> PROTO=3DUDP SPT=3D45656 DPT=3D33468 LEN=3D20 >>>>>>>>>>>>> Jul 18 16:29:39 janus kernel: RULE 1 -- ROUTE IN=3D OUT=3Deth= 2 >>>>>>>>>>>>> SRC=3D10.1.200.201 >>>>>>>>>>>>> DST=3D64.233.167.99 LEN=3D40 TOS=3D0x00 PREC=3D0x00 TTL=3D10 = ID=3D45690 >>>>>>>>>>>>> PROTO=3DUDP >>>>>>>>>>>>> SPT=3D45656 DPT=3D33468 LEN=3D20 >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> Vadim Kurland =E2=9C=8E wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Jul 18, 2007, at 2:57 PM, denpun wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Greetings >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I am using FWBUILDER 2.1.8.... >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> As per >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> http://www.nabble.com/Two-wan-interfaces- >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> tf1933781.html#a5310863 >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I have multiple WAN interfaces and am trying to route all >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> traffic >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> form >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> networks >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 10.0.0.0/16 via WAN1 >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> and 10.1.0.0/16 via WAN2 >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> and 10.2.0.0/16 via WAN3 and so on >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I went ahead and added a new rule that gets compiled as >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> follows >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> $IPTABLES -N RULE_1 -t mangle >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> $IPTABLES -t mangle -A POSTROUTING -s 10.1.0.0/16 -j >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> RULE_1 >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> $IPTABLES -t mangle -A RULE_1 -j LOG --log-level info >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> --log- >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> prefix "RULE 1 >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> -- ROUTE " >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> $IPTABLES -t mangle -A RULE_1 -j ROUTE --oif eth3 -- >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> continue >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Default route on fw machine is via WAN1 which is eth2 >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Inspite of the firewall rules, traffic from 10.1.0.0/16 >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> still >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> gets >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> routed >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> via eth2 >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Can you please help me.. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> do i need to add any other rules? >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> do these rules apply without errors on your firewall ? Do >>>>>>>>>>>>>> you >>>>>>>>>>>>>> see any >>>>>>>>>>>>>> packets in the log (one of these rules logs packets when >>>>>>>>>>>>>> they >>>>>>>>>>>>>> match) ? >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> --vk >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> ----------------------------------------------------------= =20 >>>>>>>>>>>>>> -- >>>>>>>>>>>>>> --- >>>>>>>>>>>>>> -- >>>>>>>>>>>>>> -- >>>>>>>>>>>>>> -- >>>>>>>>>>>>>> ---- >>>>>>>>>>>>>> This SF.net email is sponsored by DB2 Express >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Download DB2 Express C - the FREE version of DB2 =20 >>>>>>>>>>>>>> express and >>>>>>>>>>>>>> take >>>>>>>>>>>>>> control of your XML. No limits. Just data. Click to get >>>>>>>>>>>>>> it now. >>>>>>>>>>>>>> http://sourceforge.net/powerbar/db2/ >>>>>>>>>>>>>> _______________________________________________ >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Fwbuilder-discussion mailing list >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Fwb...@li... >>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/fwbuilder- >>>>>>>>>>>>>> discussion >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> --=20 >>>>>>>>>>>>> View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/-j- >>>>>>>>>>>>> ROUTE--- >>>>>>>>>>>>> OIF- >>>>>>>>>>>>> option-tf4106785.html#a11679001 >>>>>>>>>>>>> Sent from the fwbuilder-discussion mailing list archive at >>>>>>>>>>>>> Nabble.com. >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> -----------------------------------------------------------= =20 >>>>>>>>>>>>> -- >>>>>>>>>>>>> --- >>>>>>>>>>>>> -- >>>>>>>>>>>>> -- >>>>>>>>>>>>> -- >>>>>>>>>>>>> --- >>>>>>>>>>>>> This SF.net email is sponsored by DB2 Express >>>>>>>>>>>>> Download DB2 Express C - the FREE version of DB2 express =20 >>>>>>>>>>>>> and >>>>>>>>>>>>> take >>>>>>>>>>>>> control of your XML. No limits. Just data. Click to get it >>>>>>>>>>>>> now. >>>>>>>>>>>>> http://sourceforge.net/powerbar/db2/ >>>>>>>>>>>>> _______________________________________________ >>>>>>>>>>>>> Fwbuilder-discussion mailing list >>>>>>>>>>>>> Fwb...@li... >>>>>>>>>>>>> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/fwbuilder- >>>>>>>>>>>>> discussion >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> ------------------------------------------------------------= =20 >>>>>>>>>>>> -- >>>>>>>>>>>> --- >>>>>>>>>>>> -- >>>>>>>>>>>> -- >>>>>>>>>>>> ---- >>>>>>>>>>>> This SF.net email is sponsored by DB2 Express >>>>>>>>>>>> Download DB2 Express C - the FREE version of DB2 express >>>>>>>>>>>> and take >>>>>>>>>>>> control of your XML. No limits. Just data. Click to get it >>>>>>>>>>>> now. >>>>>>>>>>>> http://sourceforge.net/powerbar/db2/ >>>>>>>>>>>> _______________________________________________ >>>>>>>>>>>> Fwbuilder-discussion mailing list >>>>>>>>>>>> Fwb...@li... >>>>>>>>>>>> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/fwbuilder- >>>>>>>>>>>> discussion >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> --=20 >>>>>>>>>>> View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/-j-=20 >>>>>>>>>>> ROUTE--- >>>>>>>>>>> OIF- >>>>>>>>>>> option-tf4106785.html#a11679237 >>>>>>>>>>> Sent from the fwbuilder-discussion mailing list archive at >>>>>>>>>>> Nabble.com. >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> -------------------------------------------------------------= =20 >>>>>>>>>>> -- >>>>>>>>>>> --- >>>>>>>>>>> -- >>>>>>>>>>> -- >>>>>>>>>>> --- >>>>>>>>>>> This SF.net email is sponsored by DB2 Express >>>>>>>>>>> Download DB2 Express C - the FREE version of DB2 express and >>>>>>>>>>> take >>>>>>>>>>> control of your XML. No limits. Just data. Click to get it =20 >>>>>>>>>>> now. >>>>>>>>>>> http://sourceforge.net/powerbar/db2/ >>>>>>>>>>> _______________________________________________ >>>>>>>>>>> Fwbuilder-discussion mailing list >>>>>>>>>>> Fwb...@li... >>>>>>>>>>> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/fwbuilder- >>>>>>>>>>> discussion >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> --------------------------------------------------------------= =20 >>>>>>>>>> -- >>>>>>>>>> --- >>>>>>>>>> -- >>>>>>>>>> ---- >>>>>>>>>> This SF.net email is sponsored by DB2 Express >>>>>>>>>> Download DB2 Express C - the FREE version of DB2 express and >>>>>>>>>> take >>>>>>>>>> control of your XML. No limits. Just data. Click to get it =20 >>>>>>>>>> now. >>>>>>>>>> http://sourceforge.net/powerbar/db2/ >>>>>>>>>> _______________________________________________ >>>>>>>>>> Fwbuilder-discussion mailing list >>>>>>>>>> Fwb...@li... >>>>>>>>>> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/fwbuilder- >>>>>>>>>> discussion >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> --=20 >>>>>>>>> View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/-j-ROUTE--- >>>>>>>>> OIF- >>>>>>>>> option-tf4106785.html#a11688210 >>>>>>>>> Sent from the fwbuilder-discussion mailing list archive at >>>>>>>>> Nabble.com. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> ---------------------------------------------------------------= =20 >>>>>>>>> -- >>>>>>>>> --- >>>>>>>>> -- >>>>>>>>> --- >>>>>>>>> This SF.net email is sponsored by DB2 Express >>>>>>>>> Download DB2 Express C - the FREE version of DB2 express and =20 >>>>>>>>> take >>>>>>>>> control of your XML. No limits. Just data. Click to get it now. >>>>>>>>> http://sourceforge.net/powerbar/db2/ >>>>>>>>> _______________________________________________ >>>>>>>>> Fwbuilder-discussion mailing list >>>>>>>>> Fwb...@li... >>>>>>>>> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/fwbuilder-=20 >>>>>>>>> discussion >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> ----------------------------------------------------------------= =20 >>>>>>>> -- >>>>>>>> --- >>>>>>>> ---- >>>>>>>> This SF.net email is sponsored by DB2 Express >>>>>>>> Download DB2 Express C - the FREE version of DB2 express and =20 >>>>>>>> take >>>>>>>> control of your XML. No limits. Just data. Click to get it now. >>>>>>>> http://sourceforge.net/powerbar/db2/ >>>>>>>> _______________________________________________ >>>>>>>> Fwbuilder-discussion mailing list >>>>>>>> Fwb...@li... >>>>>>>> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/fwbuilder-=20 >>>>>>>> discussion >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> --=20 >>>>>>> View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/-j-ROUTE---=20 >>>>>>> OIF- >>>>>>> option-tf4106785.html#a11690510 >>>>>>> Sent from the fwbuilder-discussion mailing list archive at >>>>>>> Nabble.com. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> -----------------------------------------------------------------= =20 >>>>>>> -- >>>>>>> --- >>>>>>> --- >>>>>>> This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft >>>>>>> Defy all challenges. Microsoft Visual Studio 2005. >>>>>>> http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse0120000070mrt/direct/01/ >>>>>>> _______________________________________________ >>>>>>> Fwbuilder-discussion mailing list >>>>>>> Fwb...@li... >>>>>>> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/fwbuilder-discussion >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> ------------------------------------------------------------------= =20 >>>>>> -- >>>>>> ----- >>>>>> This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft >>>>>> Defy all challenges. Microsoft Visual Studio 2005. >>>>>> http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse0120000070mrt/direct/01/ >>>>>> _______________________________________________ >>>>>> Fwbuilder-discussion mailing list >>>>>> Fwb...@li... >>>>>> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/fwbuilder-discussion >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>> >>>> --=20 >>>> View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/-j-ROUTE---OIF- >>>> option-tf4106785.html#a11716410 >>>> Sent from the fwbuilder-discussion mailing list archive at =20 >>>> Nabble.com. >>>> >>>> >>>> --------------------------------------------------------------------= =20 >>>> -- >>>> --- >>>> This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft >>>> Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2005. >>>> http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse0120000070mrt/direct/01/ >>>> _______________________________________________ >>>> Fwbuilder-discussion mailing list >>>> Fwb...@li... >>>> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/fwbuilder-discussion >>> >>> >>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------= =20 >>> ---- >>> This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft >>> Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2005. >>> http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse0120000070mrt/direct/01/ >>> _______________________________________________ >>> Fwbuilder-discussion mailing list >>> Fwb...@li... >>> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/fwbuilder-discussion >>> >>> >> >> --=20 >> View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/-j-ROUTE---OIF-=20 >> option-tf4106785.html#a11773264 >> Sent from the fwbuilder-discussion mailing list archive at Nabble.com. >> >> >> ----------------------------------------------------------------------= =20 >> --- >> This SF.net email is sponsored by: Splunk Inc. >> Still grepping through log files to find problems? Stop. >> Now Search log events and configuration files using AJAX and a =20 >> browser. >> Download your FREE copy of Splunk now >> http://get.splunk.com/ >> _______________________________________________ >> Fwbuilder-discussion mailing list >> Fwb...@li... >> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/fwbuilder-discussion >=20 >=20 > ------------------------------------------------------------------------- > This SF.net email is sponsored by: Splunk Inc. > Still grepping through log files to find problems? Stop. > Now Search log events and configuration files using AJAX and a browser. > Download your FREE copy of Splunk now >> http://get.splunk.com/ > _______________________________________________ > Fwbuilder-discussion mailing list > Fwb...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/fwbuilder-discussion >=20 >=20 --=20 View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/-j-ROUTE---OIF-option-t= f4106785.html#a11811349 Sent from the fwbuilder-discussion mailing list archive at Nabble.com. |