Re: [sshfs] sshfs wo/glib?

[Miklos S. <mi...@sz...>]

On Mon, 12 Jan 2009, Eivind Naess wrote:
> Hi Miklos, 
> 
> Thank you for your reply but I think you missed the point. The
> static or shared form of glib will still consume lots of space
> unless I chip out the useful functions and put it into the sources
> of sshfs-fuse. Looking at the work needed to re-factor the code in
> order to make sshfs-fuse work wo/glib won't be too big. It's a
> pretty small package in terms of lines of code. Pulling in glib will
> in any form, however; will increase the footprint dramatically.
> 
> Would there be any interest in accepting a patch for this, or is
> there anyone having tangible interests in keeping this dependency?

Sure, a patch would be acceptable.

Thanks,
Miklos