Re: [fuse-devel] [ntfs-3g-devel] ntfs-3g + nfuse + uclibc

[Alon Bar-L. <alo...@gm...>]

On 11/26/07, Miklos Szeredi <mi...@sz...> wrote:
> But somehow I have the feeling Alon is not really doing his best in
> helping us find what _is_ the bug.

OK... somehow you think there is a bug in uclibc... Then someone you
think people are not trying to help you.
I invested much time in making this work at the first place, then
invested much time in order to use this symver feature in order to
reproduce the problem and failed. I can debug your libraries and even
start maintaining it for uclibc configuration... But this is not my
intention.
Now that I understand that you don't even want to support small
systems I understand that you won't even try to setup an environment.
Even if I find this problem, there may be many others, it won't end
util you certify the environment, and only you can do this, as you are
the maintainer of the code base.
So eventually I have two options, debug your code find one issue, then
use unsupported environment, or dropping the idea of using fuse and
ntfs-3g reverting to the kernel module.

Have fun in your way you treat your users.
Alon.