From: Lorinc H. <lor...@gm...> - 2007-03-06 21:00:40
|
Hi Phil, 1, actually I tried the caching also, I'm not sure I did it right: -o kernel_cache,cache=yes,cache_timeout=300,cache_stat_timeout=300,cache_dir_timeout=300 -o auto_cache,cache=yes,cache_timeout=300,cache_stat_timeout=300,cache_dir_timeout=300 With auto_cache I had 10% performance improvement, but it didn't compensate the 3 times difference. However the significant difference comes from the caching, but the original load is also slower. 2, I love the concept of SSHFS, but you are right may be I should try stunnel, ssh tunnel and openVPN also. Regards, Lorinc On 3/6/07, Phil Snowberger <psn...@cs...> wrote: > On Tue, Mar 06, 2007 at 10:15:26AM -0600, Lorinc Hever wrote: > > This application reads about 300 files first to collect some > > orientation information and after rereads the files to build a 3D > > model from the pixel data. Each file is about 512KB. > 1, I guess there's a reason you don't cache the results of the first read > (e.g. memory constraints)? > > > I measured the read time with NFS and SSHFS and I just found NFS is 3 > > times faster :( We would really prefer to use SSHFS for security > > reasons, but this performance loss is too much. > 2, Not to discourage the general use of FUSE, but have you tried NFS v4 > (which supports NFS over TCP, I believe) over SSL (with e.g. stunnel)? > > --Phil > > -- > Phil Snowberger -- psn...@cs... > Department of Computer Science and Engineering > University of Notre Dame > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------- > Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT > Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your > opinions on IT & business topics through brief surveys-and earn cash > http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.php&p=sourceforge&CID=DEVDEV > _______________________________________________ > fuse-devel mailing list > fus...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/fuse-devel > |