Re: [Funk-devel] Building funk
Status: Planning
Brought to you by:
awgh
From: Magnus T. <ma...@th...> - 2007-11-06 13:45:00
|
On Tue, Sep 25, 2007 at 13:56:56 -0400, Ben Kurtz wrote: >Hello! > >Unfortunately the SVN is currently in a bad state. Elf has been moving >from the original version of the raw-sockets egg to the >new-and-improved version. > >He has assured me that he will be checking in the rest of the new egg >sometime today. The new egg will be called 'raw-sockets' as well. > >What can you do in the meantime? > >Rather than patching the old raw-sockets, you can always install >raw-sockets via the chicken repository. We will only be submitting >known-good versions of our eggs to the chicken repository... > >Try "chicken-setup raw-sockets", it should work. > >Another, more important topic, is how to keep the SVN from being in a >bad state. > >I have been (and will continue to be) very open with handing out SVN >accounts. I would ask everyone with commit to please make sure that >the Makefiles still work at a minimum before checking anything in. > >I will be adding a basic test script in the near future, and will be >automating more testing and validation as we go. I've finally found the time to have a second look at funk. Using $CHICKEN_REPOSITORY I managed to install the dependencies without polluting any system directories. Then I put together the patch I've attached. Besides making better use of autoconf/automake this patch also makes funk buildable in a sub-directory. Something that's needed for `make distcheck` to succeed. /M -- Magnus Therning (OpenPGP: 0xAB4DFBA4) magnus@therning.org Jabber: magnus.therning@gmail.com http://therning.org/magnus |