Re: [Freeglut-developer] #include "freeglut_std.h" or #include "GL/freeglut_std.h" ?

[Vincent Favre-N. <vi...@us...>]

On Mardi 03 Mai 2005 11:20, Yuri D'Elia wrote:
> On Tue, May 03, 2005 at 05:33:51AM +0200, Vincent Favre-Nicolin wrote:
> >   The only problem is that this implies to have /usr/include/GL in the
> > include path, not only the standard /usr/include. When I look at the
> > headers in /usr/include/GL, *all* of them use the syntax #include
> > "GL/header.h" to include another GL-related header.
>
> Hi Vicent.
>
> For files included with "" syntax the path containing the source file is
> searched first. The inclusion scheme is correct.
>
> > in glut.h and freeglut.h ? Adding a -I/usr/include/GL is trivial, but it
> > breaks (although trivially) existing glut code.
>
> It should not. What compiler/platform are you using?

   It's a Fedora Core 3 PC (I only got a temporary acces).

   OK, I reviewed *more* carefully my compiling options and found my mistak=
e.=20
It turns out that for some strange reason I am using a "gcc -I- [...]"=20
option, and the -I- option (now deprecated, see=20
http://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/gcc-4.0.0/gcc/Directory-Options.html) implies=
=20
that the current directory (where the file calling the include is) is not=20
searched.

   Sorry for the mistake, and thanks for the answer and the great project !

	Cheers,
		Vincent
=2D-=20
Vincent Favre-Nicolin
Universit=E9 Joseph Fourier
http://v.favrenicolin.free.fr
ObjCryst & Fox : http://objcryst.sourceforge.net