From: Richard R. <sf...@ol...> - 2004-10-05 20:02:40
|
On Tue, Oct 05, 2004 at 02:20:11PM -0500, Steve Baker wrote: > Richard Rauch wrote: > >(Note in the below, I write "freeglut" for the freeglut project. > >This seems to be how it is usually referred to. OpenGLUT, on > >the other hand is generally capitalized as "OpenGLUT", and Kilgard's > >original GLUT as "GLUT". However, with freeglut, the style is not > >100% uniform.) >=20 > We are supposed to use 'freeglut' (no capitals) because that was the > wish of the original author. Other capitalisations are wrong - but > I'm not going to get anal about it. Well, my point in saying the above was to avoid giving the impression of downplaying freeglut by downcasing the letters. I guess I dropped that meta-explanation. However, thanks for clarifying the issue. --=20 "I probably don't know what I'm talking about." http://www.olib.org/~rkr/ |