From: Richard R. <sf...@ol...> - 2004-04-16 05:01:53
|
On Fri, Apr 16, 2004 at 12:35:23AM -0400, Nigel Stewart wrote: >=20 > >If Qt or KDE provide C bindings, why not use those directly? =20 >=20 > Probably because both Qt and KDE are C++ for good reason. :-) But the Qt-related files were, I believe, claimed to be "generated from" the C bindings. So if the C bindings provide sufficient information for the Qt port of freeglut (via Kalyptus), why not just directly use the C bindings? That was my point. I'm sure that KDE and Qt authors prefer C++ for many reasons, but am not sure that that answers the question. (^& --=20 "I probably don't know what I'm talking about." http://www.olib.org/~rkr/ |