Re: [freeelks-devel] Bug in ANY.twin

[Eric B. <er...@go...>]

I fixed it in CVS.

-- 
Eric Bezault
mailto:er...@go...
http://www.gobosoft.com


Emmanuel Stapf [ES] wrote:
> You are right. I wanted to avoid `built_in' as much as possible, but I did too
> much.
> 
> Manu
> 
> 
>>-----Original Message-----
>>From: fre...@li... 
>>[mailto:fre...@li...] On Behalf 
>>Of Eric Bezault
>>Sent: Friday, October 29, 2004 7:54 AM
>>To: freeelks-devel
>>Subject: [freeelks-devel] Bug in ANY.twin
>>
>>Hello,
>>
>>Because of personal reasons I didn't have as much time as I 
>>thought to spend on the review of the Free ELKS classes. 
>>However while rapidly browsing through class ANY I noticed 
>>that the implementation of `twin' is wrong. I think that 
>>`twin' should be `built_in'.
>>Indeed `twin' is currently frozen and calls `standard_twin'. 
>>But `standard_twin' is based on `standard_copy', not `copy'. 
>>Therefore `twin' should be made built_in and should 
>>internally rely on `copy'.
>>
>>--
>>Eric Bezault
>>mailto:er...@go...
>>http://www.gobosoft.com